[Havoc]

Right. The proof in the pudding is that it's never seen; but, to prove it you have to see it. Works about as well as the "we're not about proofs" thing and then telling everyone it's as near proven as anything can get - and oh, yeah, you'll have to trust us on that cause we're smart lol..

[CarolinaGuitarman]

"Right. The proof in the pudding is that it's never seen; but, to prove it you have to see it. Works about as well as the "we're not about proofs" thing and then telling everyone it's as near proven as anything can get - and oh, yeah, you'll have to trust us on that cause we're smart lol.."

No, the idiotic example you gave of one species giving birth to another has never been observed, because it goes against everything the ToE says. If it WAS observed, that would be a great falsification of the ToE. I am sorry you didn't realize how stupid your example was. Building a moronic strawman of what you think the theory says and then smashing this construction does not mean you have argued against the real ToE. It just means you don't know what the h*ll you're talking about.