That's another succinct way to put it. Good job.
http://www.professorbainbridge.com/2005/10/hewitt_and_mirg.html
I went onto Nexis and pulled up the transcript of Bush's November 21, 1999 Meet the Press interview. Here's what Bush said on point:
MR. RUSSERT: Would you want to know the views of a potential Supreme Court justice on abortion before they were appointed, not for a litmus test but just know their views?
GOV. BUSH: Well, let me tell you what I'd like to know. I'd like to know are we compatible from a philosophical perspective on a wide range of issues. But the most important view I want to know is are you a strict constructionist, Mr. Jurist? Will you strictly interpret the Constitution or will you use your bench as a way to legislate? That's the kind of judges I've named in the state of Texas. On of the--I've got a record on this. I've named four Supreme Court justices in our state. As you know, we elect judges in Texas. But when there's a vacancy, I name, and I do.
MR. RUSSERT: Which Supreme Court justice do you really respect?
GOV. BUSH: Well, that's--Anthony [Ed: sic] Scalia is one.
----
http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2005/10/20051004-1.html
THE PRESIDENT: [...]
Secondly, she knows the kind of judge I'm looking for -- after all, she was a part of the process that selected John Roberts. I don't want somebody to go on the bench to try to supplant the legislative process.