[FairOpinion]

"See calcowgirl's post #5: Proposition 76 - A Conservative Argument for Voting “NO”. "

===

That merely tries to substitute a huge quantity of nonsense, for a short, reasoned argument, facts and logic.

There are NO facts and logic supporting a NO vote on Prop. 76.


If you want to side with the Democrats on wanting to destroy CA, fine, but stop pretending that it's a conservative position.

[Czar]

"If you want to side with the Democrats on wanting to destroy CA, fine, but stop pretending that it's a conservative position."

Well, I guess there must be something to that old adage, "If you cannot frame a persuasive argument, then attack your opponents."

It may or may not be a conservative position, but it certainly is my position.

Since you now appear to be in the ad hominem attack mode, shall I assume you have nothing further to offer in the way of pro-#76 material?

[calcowgirl]

>>That merely tries to substitute a huge quantity of nonsense, for a short, reasoned argument, facts and logic.

Please clarify. What is "nonsense"?
(Please cite specifics, rationale, and sources.)