Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: pillbox_girl

Very interesting. Why haven't the Altamont wind turbine blades been painted, then? It sounds a lot cheaper than shutting them down for long periods as the article describes. Also, could the support structures simply be sheathed instead of replaced, or would that be more expensive?


63 posted on 10/16/2005 9:52:56 AM PDT by John Jorsett (scam never sleeps)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies ]


To: John Jorsett
Very interesting. Why haven't the Altamont wind turbine blades been painted, then? It sounds a lot cheaper than shutting them down for long periods as the article describes. Also, could the support structures simply be sheathed instead of replaced, or would that be more expensive?

Good question.

I suspect it comes from two factors:

  1. The enviro-nitwits aren't about coming up with solutions, only new things to whine about. They concentrate their efforts on creating a new government permit and regulation system for Altamont (more government bureaucracy) as well as imposing "compensation" for bird mortalities (wealth redistribution). So it should be obvious they're all too busy to actually solve any problems.
  2. The owners of Altamont probably aren't interested in the costs (however minimal) of doing any improvements. It is, after all, in the Peoples Glorious Workers Paradise Republic of Kalifornistan. They know that eventually the government will make the taxpayers foot the bill.

64 posted on 10/16/2005 1:13:07 PM PDT by pillbox_girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson