--- after she digests the briefing books -----
What a disgrace. A conservative President nominating a constitutional law light weight.
Can you imagine anyone having said this about Roberts?
The problem for Roberts was in finding people equally or more intelligent to question him.
Can you imagine anyone having said this about Clarence Thomas ?
Actually I can imagine it very well, because it WAS said about Clarence Thomas at the time of his nomination -- by DEMOCRATS.
And it was said by the whine and cheese set at National Review, though NR did tepidly support the Thomas nomination.
Clarence Thomas is one of our best justices, despite the apparent lack of a 'lifetime' of drilling in constitutional law prior to his nomination.
I believe Miers will turn out to be another Thomas.
Ah, but my good Sir - 'tis said that she handles snakes well!
Soon we will see if that Lamestream source meant legless snakes or merely spineless snakes. ;-)
Disgrace before knowledge.
Gee, I can imagine what your take on disgrace after knowledge is.
Say, Clinton impeachment or the like?
So, when were intelligence and knowledge interchangeable?
Sghe may be very intelligent but needs to become more knowledgable.
Einstein was intelligent but not a constitutional expert.
It's possible she would eat Roberts' lunch in a corporate law confrontation.