Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: curiosity

I don't see Harriet Miers being unqualified to sit on the SCOTUS. Maybe the Senate hearings will change my opinion of her. But right now, so far, so good. You think Miers is unqualified. So be it. Anyone who has been involved in legal matters for over 30 years, is a well known legal quantity, former head of a state bar association and council to the most powerful man in the world, I'd say that person is qualified to be a SC justice. Miers is a professional individual. The fact she is friends with Bush doesn't matter in my opinion. Besisdes, Miers is the nominee and she deserves a fair hearing.


251 posted on 10/15/2005 2:55:10 PM PDT by Reagan Man (Secure our borders;punish employers who hire illegals;stop all welfare to illegals)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 239 | View Replies ]


To: Reagan Man
I don't see Harriet Miers being unqualified to sit on the SCOTUS
294 posted on 10/15/2005 3:49:41 PM PDT by curiosity (Cronyism is not conservative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 251 | View Replies ]

To: Reagan Man
I don't see Harriet Miers being unqualified to sit on the SCOTUS

Fair enough, and I do. But it's not up to you or me. It's up to the Senate, and it's their perogative to detremine that she's not qualified and to vote her down because of it. That's the whole reason why we have a confirmation process.

295 posted on 10/15/2005 3:50:25 PM PDT by curiosity (Cronyism is not conservative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 251 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson