Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: curiosity
There is no prerequisite for sitting on the SCOTUS. None. You don't have to be a judge, or even a lawyer to be a justice on the high court. I'd wager a bet that Miers understands the Constitution very well. Miers said the following in her acceptance speech after Bush officially nominated her.

"It is the responsibility of every generation to be true to the founders' vision of the proper role of the courts in our society. If confirmed, I recognize that I will have a tremendous responsibility to keep our judicial system strong, and to help ensure that the courts meet their obligations to strictly apply the laws and the Constitution."

My choice would have been Michael Luttig. One problem. I'm not the President. Bush is POTUS and he has a good track record with his past nominees to the SCOTUS.

114 posted on 10/15/2005 1:02:43 PM PDT by Reagan Man (Secure our borders;punish employers who hire illegals;stop all welfare to illegals)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies ]


To: Reagan Man
There is no prerequisite for sitting on the SCOTUS.

Sure there is. It's called consent of the Senate. As Hamilton pointed out in the Federalist Papers, the whole purpose of this requirement was to ensure that President would appoint qualified individuals, not cronies.

117 posted on 10/15/2005 1:05:17 PM PDT by curiosity (Cronyism is not Conservative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson