Replies

Here's another statement by Jim:

It's long been known (and promised) that we were going to send up a conservative (that means pro-life) nominee in the mold of a Scalia. There is absolutely no excuse not to do so now. Who cares how bloody the Senate battles may get. If there's no woman who wants the job, then I'm sure there are plenty of qualified men. Somebody up there really screwed the pooch on this one.
Whoever's advising the president on this needs to grow a bigger pair!!

219 posted on 10/11/2005 9:58:50 PM PDT by Jim Robinson

111 posted on 10/15/2005 12:57:57 PM PDT by Texas Federalist (qualified to serve on the United States Supreme Court)

To: Texas Federalist; Jim Robinson

"It's long been known (and promised) that we were going to send up a conservative (that means pro-life) nominee in the mold of a Scalia. There is absolutely no excuse not to do so now. Who cares how bloody the Senate battles may get. If there's no woman who wants the job, then I'm sure there are plenty of qualified men. Somebody up there really screwed the pooch on this one. Whoever's advising the president on this needs to grow a bigger pair!!

219 posted on 10/11/2005 9:58:50 PM PDT by Jim Robinson"

It has yet to be established that President Bush promised any such thing. A few inuendos by Al Gore alleging the President said that, but I have seen no verifiable evidence. Perhaps you have some?

BTW ... Not very eloquent, was he?

But then when you own the site, might makes right.

160 posted on 10/15/2005 1:33:33 PM PDT by G.Mason ("Necessity is the mother of taking chances" ... Mark Twain)

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794