Did you not like your own words repeated back to you?
Why question my rationality, then clip an article from a paper?
The Nazis have a right to assemble for legal purposes regardless of motivation(limited only in extreme cases).
Others have an obligation to allow them to do so. (Limited to even more extreme conditions).
None of those conditions were met in this case.
You have not clarified in the tiniest bit why you think it is acceptable to expect people of a certain ethnic background to not conform to the same responsibilities as the rest of us in this society.
Don't clip an article. Don't name call. Support your statements.
The evil Nazis did not cause the riots. The expectation - and almost acceptance - that blacks would riot - rather than obey the law and allow a peaceful rally to occur - is what caused the riots. Listen to the spin - people discussing "who was responsible for the riots" - as if there is some complexity here. There is no complexity. The rioters are responsible for the riots.
The issue is implanting in their minds that they are responsible for their actions. Part of that is reminding everyone else that no one is responsible for these people's actions but themselves. We need to expect better.
Expecting better may not be rational, but it is the right thing to do.
I did. Evidently you didn't read it. There's more going on here than you think. I never said the rioters were anything other than criminals. Ever. But this situation isn't as simple as you'd like to make it. An article I couldn't post here said the FBI requested a letter that the nazis sent Mr Szych. You need to Google the guy and read more. This didn't start with the nazis. It started with Mr Szych.