"Hallucinating discrimination, and maligning the motives of others, is not a pretty thing."
And you are comparing me to Farrakhan, just about the most openly antisemitic dude in the USA today. And both of these items are in one post with no hint of irony on your part.
My, my ... this Southern White Protestant SCOTUS thing has really really touched a nerve I see.
If you do not want to be compared to Farrakhan, you should not think and act like him, which you are.
When you smear dozens of sincere principled conservatives as anti-southern evangelical bigots, you are acting like Farrakhan, who smeared whites as somehow scheming to flood New Orleans to kill black people. It would be bad enough for you to smear one person in this way, but you manage to smear every conservative with a principled concern about a candidate with no documented judicial philosophy.
Both your theory and Farrakhan's, involve hallucatinatory, slanderous allegations of bigotry. Both theories serve only to forment hatred.
What would you think if someone alleged that Bush nominated Mier's precisely because she was a southern Evanglical SMU grad like his wife? Discriminating in favor of these things? It's a mirror image of your argument, quite ugly isn't it? Hallucinating discrimination, and impugning the motives of others, is a terrible thing.