Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: AmericaUnited

Results oriented jurisprudence is EXACTLY what is wrong with the courts today. Conservatives have been fighting the notion that little things like the constituion and the framer's intent are secondary to "getting things right" (e.g. the court's finding an essential need for diversity in the University of Michigan case).

Now we're supposed to accept a mediocre nominee because she'll "vote correctly"?


83 posted on 10/15/2005 5:51:29 AM PDT by Skip Ripley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies ]


To: Skip Ripley
Now we're supposed to accept a mediocre nominee because she'll "vote correctly"?

My definition of "vote correctly" is voting as a strict constructionist. Why is your 'definition' different?

86 posted on 10/15/2005 6:00:21 AM PDT by AmericaUnited
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson