The best argument is that she doesn't belong on the Supreme Court according to any enumerated or implied criteria delineated by this president.
The arguments against her are seemingly endless-and multiply by the hour-whereas I've only stumbled upon one compelling argument for her confirmation.
Namely, that she would be much better on 2nd Amendment issues than most other SC justices.
I know you've lost when you have to resort to twisting words in replies like that. She's got Teflon, she'll be in like Flint so you'll just have to put it in your shapka and smoke it.