My answer is in post #29
> My answer is in post #29
Sorry, I don't buy it. Not to say that what you allege isn't true. I can believe that opinion writing is an iterative process, certainly. What I am saying is that it is not only "not ideal" to have a justice who doesn't write well sitting on the court, but it detracts from the court's greater mission to expect the other justices to be spending valuable time helping another justice rewrite her poorly written opinions.
Can it be done? Of course it can. But it is inexcusable when there are other better candidates to choose from. I'm not beating up on the President for making the nomination, because it is his to make. But, I am very disappointed in it, and any explanation that Miers is the best candidate for the job appear to be patently false.