What you want me to see as the work product of Harriet Miers is self-evidently the work product of 6 other attorneys, many of whom have well-documented records as appellate attorneys. The question, in fact, is why she is signing it at all. Answer, because she is Bush's attorney. BTW Cheney's standing in the case is at least equal to Bush's, he being the one whose claim of Wyoming residence is challenged.
You seem to think you can just wave all that away absent any evidence to support your wishful assertions whatsoever.
Unless you have evidence that the brief she signed was not her work product and her opponent was wrong in his characterization of her contribution and ability, you have nothing to add because I'm not interested in how you want the world to be, I'm interested in how it is.