Replies

To whom? The person who has the constitutional duty/authority/privilege to nominate says he knows her very, very well. Many people who have worked with her, or know her personally over a long period of time, support her strongly. So where in the Constitution is the requirement that the nominee must be well known to 'the people' and 'the people' must approve? Did I miss that somewhere?

Read parts of this thread, and get back to me with your answer. It is impossible to give principled advice and consent when the nominee is a cipher.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1502188/posts?page=6#6

Check posts #6, #7, #12 & #13.

It is impossible to give principled advice and consent when the nominee is a cipher.

Oh?! You mean the Senate IS NOT going to have hearings on this nominee, to get the information by which they can do the 'advice and consent' thing? I missed that too...