[mrsmith]

"the "stealth is okay - trust in GWB" camp has been more prolific with misleading posts, than the "fact finding and rational discussion" camp is."

Then you must be on the hate-Miers,er, "fact finding and rational discussion" side.

Come on, you're on a thread about a critic who tries to treat her casual writings as professional ones (dishonesty anyone?) and when he can't deride the style of her only professional writing cited makes the absurd criticism that whether the court of the legislature set caps on lawyer fees isn't a separation of powers issue!

Both sides are ridiculous. There are no hard facts to go on. She is truly a stealth nominee.

[jwalsh07]

Fein writes that Miers should be ashamed of seeking a partisan outcome when she is a partisan. Logic there is a little shaky.

[Cboldt]

Come on, you're on a thread about a critic who tries to treat her casual writings as professional ones (dishonesty anyone?) and when he can't deride the style of her only professional writing cited makes the absurd criticism that whether the court of the legislature set caps on lawyer fees isn't a separation of powers issue!

Both sides are ridiculous. There are no hard facts to go on. She is truly a stealth nominee.

Actually, it is the "fact finding and rational discussion" side that agrees with your last point. That she truly is a stealth candidate. ANd therein lies the primary and fatal flaw in the nomination.