Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Missouri Tobacco tax gets key GOP support. 80-cent-a-pack increase sought.
Kansas City Star ^ | 10/14/5 | Tim Hoover

Posted on 10/14/2005 6:34:56 PM PDT by Crackingham

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-90 next last
To: Stingy Dog
My wife had quit 6 months earlier. I had just gotten a new company car that smelled so much better than the old one I'd stinked up. I had moved from regular Winstons to Winston Lights, then Winston Ultra Lights (they actually increased my consumption because I wasn't getting my former jolt of nicotine).
One night I coughed myself awake at 2 am and naturally went out to the kitchen for a smoke. I was out, wife didn't have any packs and no smokes stashed yet in the new car... I found the last pack in my shirt pocket with two left. Smoked one and vowed I would smoke the last one the next morning. Some kind of self-hypnosis because that's exactly what I did. Tossed the empty pack and never bought another one. Last cigs cost me $.50. How much are they now ?
61 posted on 10/15/2005 1:32:07 PM PDT by Eric in the Ozarks (Troubled by NOLA looting ? You ain't seen nothing yet.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: SheLion

Don't give 'em any ideas!


62 posted on 10/15/2005 1:52:47 PM PDT by Ostlandr ("Billions down the drain, and we ain't plugged it yet." - Federal Government motto)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: metesky

A buddy of mine saw a tractor-trailer load of cigs get hijacked in broad daylight on the BQE (Bronx-Queens Expressway.) Kids pulled up behind the truck in a mini-pickukp, cut the locks, and were passing cartons over the hood into the back of the truck. Driver probably never even knew they were there (or did he?)


63 posted on 10/15/2005 2:00:33 PM PDT by Ostlandr ("Billions down the drain, and we ain't plugged it yet." - Federal Government motto)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: gondramB
I can make an argument that , if taxes need to be collected, it makes sense to target those products that cost society (and the government) money.

What products cost society (and the government) money?

64 posted on 10/15/2005 3:10:07 PM PDT by elkfersupper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: elkfersupper

"What products cost society (and the government) money?"


First of all, I understand a system like this could never be really implemented because it would be too unwieldy and never should be implemented because no conservative in his right mind want the government integrated so deeply into the details of our lives. Government should be for broad sweeps, like defense, trade, border security etc.

To me, I don't mind taxes as much when they apply to products that, used as intended, do far greater harm than good, with a high cost and that is not essential.

Limited like that I don't have a lot of other suggestions.

Guns, for example are a benefit when used as intended. They are only harmful if misused.

Cars provide so much benefit and are essential... Alcohol is only harmful is misused. A glass of wine each day is actually healthy.

Cigarettes really stand out. I guess heroin and cocaine should be taxed if they are ever made legal. And I know in Atlanta there is a gay club that has bareback Hiv positive sex parties. The CDC should probably be by the entrance collecting a large tax.


65 posted on 10/15/2005 4:08:51 PM PDT by gondramB (Conservatism is a positive doctrine. Reactionaryism is a negative doctrine.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

Comment #66 Removed by Moderator

Comment #67 Removed by Moderator

To: Just another Joe
... even though lawmakers are struggling to find long-term solutions to address health-care needs for the poor and uninsured.

It boggles the mind how people can justify in their minds increasing taxes on a product to both increase revenue and decrease the use of the same product at the same time.

68 posted on 10/15/2005 6:14:18 PM PDT by kerryusama04 (The UN wants our guns so they can rape our children and steal our money)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SheLion

You convinced me to trying rolling my own cigarettes, and were you ever right!! We are saving a lot and I really like the taste better. I felt kind of guilty ordering my tubes off the net, but our local smoke shop charges over $3/box of tubes and I ordered than for less than $1.75/ box (course I had to get a case). I'm still buying the tobacco locally, I really like the American Spirit brand(100% US Grown),additive free.

Thanks for the information and encouragement. LSA


69 posted on 10/15/2005 6:34:12 PM PDT by LSAggie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: drt1; Madame Dufarge; Mears; SheLion

I posted this on another thread She started, I'll say it again here:

Alcohol certainly can be compared to tobacco. It's a big problem. If you think most people drink moderately, why do we have 6.8 million binge drinkers and 2.1 million heavy drinkers under the age of 21? In this country, 76 MILLION people have at least one alcoholic in their family. My stepfather was one. He finally joined A.A. and quit-he stayed sober for 50 years almost to the day before he died. He told me many times-"I don't see what the big fuss is over smokers & tobacco. Alcohol is the worst drug in this country. Always has been. Always will be." Three million violent crimes are committed each year under its influence. It's not harmless.


70 posted on 10/16/2005 4:30:44 AM PDT by The Foolkiller ( Why......That sounds.....FOOLish!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: LSAggie
Thanks for the information and encouragement. LSA

Well, I don't want to 'encourage' anyone to smoke. LOL!  But if you are going to do it, may as well do it as cheap as you can.  The lawmakers know a lot of us really enjoy the "habit," so they think they can bleed our pockets dry.  But, where there is a will there is a way of keeping our money away from them.

One gal in southern Maine figured it out that if Maine had just added one penny to each can of beer, the taxes on cigarettes wouldn't have gone up.  But oh no!  The lawmakers like their "brew" so they wouldn't touch it.

71 posted on 10/16/2005 9:20:09 AM PDT by SheLion (Trying to make a life in the BLUE state of Maine!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: The Foolkiller
Alcohol is the worst drug in this country. Always has been. Always will be.

I would much rather pass a smoker on the highway then a drinker anytime!  At least when we smoke, it doesn't make us all ga-ga in the head!

72 posted on 10/16/2005 9:22:05 AM PDT by SheLion (Trying to make a life in the BLUE state of Maine!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: gondramB
Cigarettes really stand out.

Smoking cigarettes has been shown to reduce instances of prostate cancer and also keeps irritable bowel syndrome under control (along with other dried leaves of the nightshade family such as tomatoes and eggplant).

73 posted on 10/16/2005 1:37:55 PM PDT by elkfersupper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: gondramB

"And taxes on cigarettes that cost us a great deal of money for health insurance and lost productivity."

Please offer actual proof of this assertion. In reality, this is the logic that lead the the MSA with most of the states, now that money is being used in the general funds or for just plain vote buying. If the costs you describe truly existed, then the money would be being spent on these items now. Since the costs still "exist" after the MSA, then the states must not be using that revenue on these costs. Therefore, they must not be a legitimate liability to the states.


74 posted on 10/17/2005 5:30:10 AM PDT by CSM (When laws are written, they apply to ALL...Not just the yucky people you don't like. - HairOfTheDog)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: gondramB

"I agree the scope of government is far to large. But something has to be taxed to pay for it. My argument was that in selecting what to tax it should be done in a way to do as little harm as possible. By targeting items that do great harm to society we at least do some good."

How do you propose lowering the scope of government when you burden the minority of the population to carry the burden of government?


75 posted on 10/17/2005 5:49:13 AM PDT by CSM (When laws are written, they apply to ALL...Not just the yucky people you don't like. - HairOfTheDog)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: Crackingham
Missouri Tobacco tax gets key GOP support. 80-cent-a-pack increase sought.

Stupid is as stupid does.

76 posted on 10/17/2005 5:52:28 AM PDT by Dustbunny (Main Stream Media -- Making 'Max Headroom' a reality.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SheLion
I don't want to 'encourage' anyone to smoke

Believe me you didn't!! I've been smoking for a long time, and I almost weep when I think of how much money I've wasted not rolling my own.

I saw on another link that Missouri had received over $211 million since 1998 from the Tobacco settlement. Gee, I wonder where all that money went. I have heard that many states used the tobacco money as "collateral" for road, bridge and other such improvements. If the tobacco companies ever went bankrupt and could no longer pay the settlement monies, it would fall on the general population of the state to pay for those improvements themselves. Kind of a delicious irony about the whole thing (also why tobacco will always be sold!)
77 posted on 10/17/2005 7:33:31 AM PDT by LSAggie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: Crackingham

Ya know, it seems high damn time that the poor and uninsured take care of themselves. I know that sounds harsh but every time I turn around I'm asked to give away money I EARNED to take care of someone else who didn't earn their own care. When does it stop?


78 posted on 10/17/2005 7:46:51 AM PDT by Sunshine Sister
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CSM

"
How do you propose lowering the scope of government when you burden the minority of the population to carry the burden of government?"

That's an excellent point and it's one of the problems caused by a one man, one vote system. In fact my signature used to be "A government which robs Peter to pay Paul, can always count on the support of Paul."


79 posted on 10/17/2005 10:03:57 AM PDT by gondramB (Conservatism is a positive doctrine. Reactionaryism is a negative doctrine.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: CSM

"Please offer actual proof of this assertion."

Obviously I can't do the scientific research myself but I already posted a link above from the CDC on causes of death and saying that one fifth of all deaths in the U.S.A. are caused by smoking.

I also cited the personal example that my father in law is expected to die this week of lung cancer and that medical expenses during the years leading up to his death have exceeded his lifetime earnings, not just his lifetime taxes.


80 posted on 10/17/2005 10:07:09 AM PDT by gondramB (Conservatism is a positive doctrine. Reactionaryism is a negative doctrine.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-90 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson