Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Tax-chick

1800s? The Roman Empire, and its successors in the Eastern Mediterranean, didn't decline in the 3rd Century.


14 posted on 10/14/2005 5:17:33 PM PDT by muawiyah (/ hey coach do I gotta' put in that "/sarcasm " thing again? How'bout a double sarcasm for this one)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]


To: muawiyah

Wasn't Rome sacked by Goths and Vandals, and then taken over completely by the Goths (Theodoric Amalung, and those guys) in the 5th century (give or take on the dates, my books are in the other room)?

I understand the greater continuity of Byzantium, but did that extend to regular trade as far as Britain?


15 posted on 10/14/2005 5:20:50 PM PDT by Tax-chick (When bad things happen, conservatives get over it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

To: muawiyah

The 3rd Century was a period of decline. It was rescued by Diocletian and Constantine


49 posted on 10/15/2005 9:28:27 AM PDT by RobbyS ( CHIRHO)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson