Carol Schwartz (R-At Large), who has sponsored legislation to lower the legal limit for drunken driving, said she was not aware that police officers are arresting drivers who have as little as .01 percent blood alcohol contentSorry, Carol. Try and get that toothpaste back in the tube and you will be viciously attacked by MADD and others.
A follow-up to this thread.
Single Glass of Wine Immerses D.C. Driver in Legal Battle
To: George_Bailey
Follow-up to your previous thread.
To: elkfersupper
Just a little impaired behind the wheel is the same as being just a little pregnant.
3 posted on
10/14/2005 4:05:37 PM PDT by
mtbopfuyn
(Legality does not dictate morality... Lavin)
To: elkfersupper
Let me get this straight. If they have 0 tolerance, then the worst ones will be ignored?
6 posted on
10/14/2005 4:10:24 PM PDT by
phatoldphart
(DAMM - Drunks Against Mad Mothers)
To: elkfersupper
This is actually a good idea…….
If your sole peruse is to generate revenue.
10 posted on
10/14/2005 4:16:28 PM PDT by
usurper
(Correct spelling is overrated)
To: elkfersupper
It's a shame DUI doesn't carry the same penalty as perjuring yourself before a grand jury or stealing classified documents from the National Archives.
To: elkfersupper
I think the officers in these cases should be fired. This is disgusting.
21 posted on
10/14/2005 9:08:38 PM PDT by
Enterprise
(The modern Democrat Party - a toxic stew of mental illness, cultism, and organized crime.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson