Skip to comments.
Questions About Miers That Bush Needs to Answer
Human Events Online ^
| 10-14-05
| Schlafly, Phyllis
Posted on 10/14/2005 12:38:54 PM PDT by Theodore R.
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 161-163 next last
To: MNJohnnie
Bush has NO questions to answer ... you self appointed critics have NO role in this. Um ... I'm not sure you want to say things like that.
Ms. Schafly is a conserative hero ... and like everyone else, she has a perfect right to question this nomination.
To: indcons
I don't think Hariiet Miers is the most qualified person in the country
But I am think she will be very Conservative
But I think overturning Roe v. Wade will be a disaster for Republicans
42
posted on
10/14/2005 1:11:26 PM PDT
by
richconklin
(Character, in the long run, is the decisive factor in the life of an individual and of nations alike)
To: MNJohnnie
"The Conservative PUNDITS need to explain to us WHY we should pay ANY attention to their temper tantrum."
The simplest answer: Because we vote!
43
posted on
10/14/2005 1:12:17 PM PDT
by
Prolifeconservative
(If there is another terrorist attack, the womb is a very unsafe place to hide.)
To: indcons
Random thoughts:
I don't think Hariiet Miers is the most qualified person in the country
But I think she will be very Conservative
And I think overturning Roe v. Wade will be a disaster for Republicans
I am ready for George Allen in 2008
44
posted on
10/14/2005 1:12:19 PM PDT
by
richconklin
(Character, in the long run, is the decisive factor in the life of an individual and of nations alike)
To: Theodore R.
Since your wife, your mother, and all the women you have appointed to high office (such as Condoleezza Rice and RNC Co-Chairman Jo Ann Davidson) oppose overturning Roe v. Wade, how can we assume Miers will be any different? Good one.
45
posted on
10/14/2005 1:12:29 PM PDT
by
Texas Federalist
(qualified to serve on the United States Supreme Court)
To: HapaxLegamenon
Who do the Senators, who will vote whether or not to confirm Miers, represent? Are not the citizens who elected them entitled to express their views on the matter? Are citizens who think their elected leaders have made an error in judgment not entitled to an redress of grievances? Are you done with the hysterics?
No one is stopping you from picking up the phone and saying your opinions.
46
posted on
10/14/2005 1:12:53 PM PDT
by
Dane
( anyone who believes hillary would do something to stop illegal immigration is believing gibberish)
To: Dane
Just another whole loafer.
47
posted on
10/14/2005 1:12:58 PM PDT
by
gov_bean_ counter
(It is easy to call for a pi$$ing contest when you aren't going to be in the line of fire.)
To: gondramB
Details, details can't let details get in the way of high dudgeon. Phylis is just upset because she wasn't consulted.
To: Theodore R.
Mrs. Miers. At one point in time you were given a .45 cal pistol by a relative. Do you still own said pistol, have you ever actually fired said pistol, what is your current carry pistol, and do you prefer a Kydex quick fire rig to an Uncle Mike's IWB crossdraw?
If your answers are "No", "No", "Nothing", and "What?" then you are not what we need sitting on the USSC right now...
49
posted on
10/14/2005 1:14:07 PM PDT
by
Dead Corpse
(Anyone who needs to be persuaded to be free, doesn't deserve to be. -El Neil)
To: AmericaUnited
Good God! How many 'conservatives' are going to shamefully exploit this situation to get either their 15 minutes in the spotlight or grandstand? Cut them some slack! Everyone has to make a living. :^)
50
posted on
10/14/2005 1:14:26 PM PDT
by
TheDon
(The Democratic Party is the party of TREASON!)
To: justshutupandtakeit
There is no requirement that nominations be popular with all or acceptable to all or even to any except 100 people deciding to accept or reject. And THAT is how it was designed by the Founders who wanted to keep the voters out of this completely. So, in other words, the Anti's are demanding that an unconstitutional method be used to insure we get a strict contitutionalist judge. LOL!
To: Theodore R.
Pretty hard to beat that list of questions.
To: richconklin
And I think overturning Roe v. Wade will be a disaster for Republicans
Why? Pls. explain.
53
posted on
10/14/2005 1:15:52 PM PDT
by
indcons
(Let the Arabs take care of their jihadi brothers this time around (re: Paki earthquake))
To: Leonine
Excuse me, but this is an outrageous comment. And BTW, the rate of illegal immigration has increased dramatically under Bush relative to Clinton Sheesh your above italicized comments have the same sincerity, IMO, as when there was a coffee commercial placement in the movie "The Truman Show".
54
posted on
10/14/2005 1:17:41 PM PDT
by
Dane
( anyone who believes hillary would do something to stop illegal immigration is believing gibberish)
To: richconklin
Overturning Roe V. Wade would be the best thing that ever came upon the conservative revolution.
55
posted on
10/14/2005 1:18:00 PM PDT
by
Prolifeconservative
(If there is another terrorist attack, the womb is a very unsafe place to hide.)
To: MNJohnnie
"THEY have to explain to US why we should listen to them over the people "
Well, she gave you a list of questions she thought Bush should answer.
That's not allowed either in your world?
Wait... Let me rephrase than in terms you can understand:
THAT'S not allowed EITHER in YOUR world?
To: indcons
And I think overturning Roe v. Wade will be a disaster for Republicans I am staunchly pro-life but do agree that the voters just are not ready for Roe overturned yet. More minds and hearts have to be prepared. Bush has said the same thing. Of course the politically ignorant don't care if the whole house collapses, as long as they get to pull out the few bricks from it they demand.
To: Dane
And BTW, the rate of illegal immigration has increased dramatically under Bush relative to Clinton. Sheesh your above italicized comments have the same sincerity, IMO, as when there was a coffee commercial placement in the movie "The Truman Show".
What are you talking about??
58
posted on
10/14/2005 1:19:59 PM PDT
by
Leonine
To: Dane
Some of the Posts seem the suggest that we have no right to dare to question the wisdom of our emperor G.W. on his selection.
To: MNJohnnie
[ We are a Constitutional Republic, not a Democracy, you self appointed critics have NO role in this. ]
True.. Bush is a RINO selecting RINOs. Thats as it should be..
He has a perfect right to select those that mirror or he thinks mirrors his stands..
Meirs and Roberts would and will perform as brilliantly as the one that selected them..
Probably that is what pisses everybody off..
Ok not everybody... the non RINOs then...
60
posted on
10/14/2005 1:21:23 PM PDT
by
hosepipe
(This Propaganda has been edited to include not a small amount of Hyperbole..)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 161-163 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson