You just have to go with the best evidence...The trouble with Miers is there is no evidence. Because Due Diligence has failed us in the past is not an excuse. In the case of some past appointments my opnion is the President at the time did not properly vet and in others where there was a clear record the Sentators looked the otherway. None of that says we should not continue to try to identify acceptable candidates and complain when there is such a lack of evidence as in this case..I gues one thing that troubles me most is Bush himself has not been able to give us anything but platitudes to recommend his own choice. Where's the Beef here? We must agree to disagree.
"We must agree to disagree."
LOL! At last, something we both can agree on.