OK. You gave three reasons to oppose Miers. I said all three were false.
Let's make this easy. Prove to me I'm wrong on the FIRST charge. Or at least, give one supporting piece of evidence that shows that the first thing you mentioned is NOT false.
Yes, I called you a liar. I don't normally do that. But you KNOW that Miers supports the federalist society. She said it, We've said it, the VP of the society says it. Her quotes from 1989 don't even support your charge. YOU KNOW this, or should know it (you don't appear to be stupid). I've seen you on discussions for the past two weeks. You are IN the threads where these are debunked.
For you to still use this as arguments against her is dishonrdy. And you are NOT doing it out of ignorance. You WANT to mislead people here. And you succeed, others quote this same lie, because they saw you and for some reason trust you to tell the truth.
I generously grant that you do so because you really and truly believe (with no proof) that she will be a bad justice.
But since you spent two weeks telling everybody that "trust me" isn't a valid argument, you can hardly tell us now to "trust you" that she will be bad.
So instead you repeat this lie about her to back up your feelings about her.
So go ahead, prove that she opposes the Federalist Society. Tell me that you had NO IDEA Leo Leonard was associated with the Federalist Society and had endorsed her.
I'm not going to tell you again: post as many times to me as you want, I don't reply to abuse.