Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: moose2004
Wasn't Anthony Kennedy Reagan's third nominee for one seat? Honestly I don't remember (I know he was at least the second nominee for that seat), either way it didn't weaken Reagan.

Well, it weakened Reagan in the sense that we ended up with Anthony Kennedy on the SC vs the two prior nominees who would have been more conservative (was it Carswell and Bork?). So given that outcome, the SC has definitely been weakened by Anthony Kennedy professing his admiration for using foreign law and his votes in passing liberal activist rulings.

I believe that either of his two prior nominees would have been constitutional advocates vs swing vote moderate-liberal Anthony Kennedy! Another win for the left-wing and loss for the conservatives.

100 posted on 10/14/2005 8:31:07 AM PDT by rcrngroup
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]


To: rcrngroup

I agree. The other failed nominee was Ginsburg, he confessed to smoking pot in college, or something like that.


110 posted on 10/14/2005 8:38:12 AM PDT by moose2004 (You Can Run But You Can't Hide!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies ]

To: rcrngroup

Kennedy had a lot of history with both Reagan and Ed Meese. Everyone expected him to be a reliable conservative vote. Unfortunately he has drifted left through the years. At the moment he is still the third or fourth most conservative member of the court. As we like to say in Sacramento, at least he's not Souter.


122 posted on 10/14/2005 8:44:26 AM PDT by stop_fascism (The goal is 5 votes that uphold the constitution)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson