>My office cleaning lady is also hard working and compassionate. Thank God she doesn't work at the White House or she'd be a Supreme Court nominee.<
Bet that the fact she is the cleaning lady is the only thing you know about her.
>My office cleaning lady is also hard working and compassionate. Thank God she doesn't work at the White House or she'd be a Supreme Court nominee.<
"Bet that the fact she is the cleaning lady is the only thing you know about her."
Apparently your reading comprehension isn't very high. The tongue-in-cheek implication was that if the hard working compassionate cleaning lady worked at the White House, and Bush knew her well, that she would be a potential candidate. Whether I know squat/diddly about the cleaning lady is less important than that Bush is guilty of cronyism on this most important matter. Apparently you believe hardworking and compassionate trump "effective constitutionalist advocate/scholar/jurist". Which is truly sad, because your qualifications would admit the nomination of the cleaning lady while mine require an outstanding jurist.