snip
"JUL. 4, 2005: DARK HORSE ... ... in the Supreme Court sweepstakes: Keep an eye on Harriet Miers, White House counsel. Miers was the first woman president of the Texas Bar Association, a co-managing partner of a 400-lawyer firm in Texas, a one-time Dallas city councilor, and by the by, the personal lawyer to one George W. Bush. She joined his staff as governor, served as staff secretary (Richard Darman's old job) in the first administration, and now oversees the White House's legal work. She is quiet, discreet, intensely loyal to Bush personally, and - though not ideologically conservative - nonetheless firmly pro-life. Plus she's a woman. Double plus - she'd be a huge surprise, and the president loves springing surprises on Washington and those pundits who think they know it all."
"Double plus?"
FGS.
So we now know that Frum was for Harriet Miers before he was against her
One more time: point us to the language in Frum's July 4 entry that justifies your Clintonesque smear of Frum that he was "for Harriet Miers before he was against her." If you have any decency. Do that, or offer a public apology to David Frum.
I've read this before and still don't see where he endorses her. He is clearly savering a prediction as all journalists do. He even admits to her not being a conservative. I don't understand getting an endorsement out of this at all.