To: rlmorel; nunya bidness
ok, allow this poor ignorant (but suspicious) wretch to take a wild shot at the pot:
If I were to Google up the term(s) of Senator McCarthy and compare them with the dates between which the HUAAC was active, would I discover that they were not concurrent?
9 posted on
10/13/2005 9:57:47 PM PDT by
King Prout
("La LAAAA La la la la... oh [bleep!] Gargamel has a FLAMETHROWEEEEEAAAAAAARRRRRGH!")
To: King Prout
It's my understading that HUAC overlapped the time when McCarthy was active on the Senate side. But the fatal mistake that most on the left (especially in Hollywood and the media) make is that they attribute McCarthy with HUAC. Ann Coulter's book Treason is an excellent source for this era.
To: King Prout
HUAAC: 1945-1969 (to 1975, under a new name)
Tailgunner's terms: 1947-1957
well, they are concurrent.
15 posted on
10/13/2005 10:07:34 PM PDT by
King Prout
("La LAAAA La la la la... oh [bleep!] Gargamel has a FLAMETHROWEEEEEAAAAAAARRRRRGH!")
To: King Prout
They might be, but McCarthy was a Sinator (no typo), and had nothing to do with HUAC.
16 posted on
10/13/2005 10:08:05 PM PDT by
SAJ
To: King Prout
"DING DING DING! What do we have for her, Johnny?"
You hit the nail right on the head, mostly. His term began in 1948 or something like that, but his activities did not begin until later. There was no overlap in his activities and HUAAC's activities...
66 posted on
10/14/2005 3:47:48 AM PDT by
rlmorel
("Innocence seldom utters outraged shrieks. Guilt does." Whittaker Chambers)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson