Read what you sign.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-31 last
To: School of Rational Thought
The Lesbians really have this guy on the "carpet".
To: School of Rational Thought
The man claims that it was never intended that he should take reponsibility for the children, but rather that the women would be their parents and he would meet them occasionally. That was his mistake! When you donate your sperm give them the cup and walk away. This guy wanted visitation rights which is probably why he had to admit paternity. I don't feel sorry for him at all. If you want to visit your genetic offspring then take some responsibility.
To: School of Rational Thought
I might be able to see this if he made a "direct deposit"..
To: School of Rational Thought
49 posted on
10/13/2005 9:08:18 AM PDT by
UnklGene
To: School of Rational Thought
50 posted on
10/13/2005 9:11:16 AM PDT by
UnklGene
To: School of Rational Thought
51 posted on
10/13/2005 9:13:43 AM PDT by
UnklGene
To: School of Rational Thought
52 posted on
10/13/2005 9:16:31 AM PDT by
UnklGene
To: School of Rational Thought
This might put a serious crimp in the sperm bank business!
To: School of Rational Thought
You are responsible for the children you co-create. Period.
55 posted on
10/13/2005 9:25:05 AM PDT by
Lorianne
To: School of Rational Thought
From the article: "But the court ruled that this was irrelevant, and that he was still the childrens legal father."
Ok. So I assume the femine half of the 'couple' kept the children. The butch one vamoosed. Do the kids really have two mommies and one daddy or one mommy and two daddies? Is the lesbo butch butcher than the male butch? Does the female daddy have to pay support as well?
65 posted on
10/13/2005 10:33:18 AM PDT by
griffin
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-31 last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson