To: Dog Gone
"William Rehnquist had never been a judge before his appointment."
Yes, however, Rehnquist had SCOTUS experience and, while there, in his early years, was provided with a continuous education in regard to constitutional law (served as a law clerk for SCOTUS Justice R. Jackson). As a clerk, Rehnquist was an apprentice, an internal, behind-the-scences observer to the SCOTUS. It goes without saying that Rehnquist had a depth of background and experience with constitutional law not, by any stretch of the imagination, matched by Miers.
195 posted on
10/12/2005 7:39:07 PM PDT by
jdm
To: jdm
Constitutional law isn't that hard. I hate to break this fact to the general public, but it's true. There's no doubt that the amount of case law on it is huge, but even the three-prong tests that the court has set up to evaluate certain issues aren't that terribly complicated.
What matters is your philosophy in addressing those issues.
I still don't know why my law school grade in Federal Income Taxation Law, which I hated and still don't understand, slightly beat out my Con Law grade. I could answer those senators all day without looking at notes, and my job today doesn't involve constitutional law very often at all. Maybe once every ten years.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson