Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Cboldt

If she didn't decline, she must be the 1 that was disqualified on her history.(?)


99 posted on 10/12/2005 12:55:36 PM PDT by michigander (The Constitution only guarantees the right to pursue happiness. You have to catch it yourself.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies ]


To: michigander

Karen Williams also did not decline...


109 posted on 10/12/2005 12:59:18 PM PDT by ContemptofCourt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies ]

To: michigander

What history would disqualify them that wasn't already brought up during the confirmation hearings for the Appeals Court?? Here's my guess, some random woman under consideration - maybe even two of them - who haven't gone through recent confirmation, much less an acrimonious confirmation, were disqualified on the basis of some vague past allegation, and the White House is spinning these statements based on that.

Yeah, I don't trust the WH. I guess that's obvious..


120 posted on 10/12/2005 1:03:47 PM PDT by AntiGuv (™)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson