uh...no.
just because she is nominated doesn't mean we have to lock step support a candidate. If she is not worthy of being nominated, why is she worthy of being supported as the nominee?
Merely because the president nominated her?
Sorry,I wouldn't accept that if clinton was president, and I won't accept it when GWB is president. My standards don't shift based on the party in power.
My standards don't shift based on the party in power either. But in answer to your question, Constitutionally speaking (and along with advice and counsel of Congress), the President nominating her IS the determining factor in whether or not she is worthy of being nominated. I'm caught in the unfortunate position here of disliking the choice, but being unable to find valid grounds from which to contend against the nomination.