Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ContemptofCourt
What still nags at the back of my mind - if Miers was the point person for vetting candidates for the SCOTUS and also in consideration for the position, isn't that a total conflict of interest? "We can't find anyone, Mr. President, aside from myself."

The story floating that someone backed out over the weekend and Andy Card pushing Miers to take the slot sounds most reasonable at this point. They self imposed a deadline of that Monday to announce and didn't feel that they had enough time to fully vet another candidate...

Of course, this begs the question to be asked - why not? Someone should have assumed that at some point in eight years that Bush would be making a nomination or two, and they should have had a thick file full of folks already vetted and ready to step forward. I don't like the reactionary implications here.
118 posted on 10/12/2005 1:03:16 PM PDT by kingu (Draft Fmr Senator Fred Thompson for '08.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies ]


To: kingu

This nomination, and the people that blindly support it, are no different than the RATS who condoned Cigar Boy's behavior.

Its party over principal.


128 posted on 10/12/2005 1:06:00 PM PDT by chris1 ("Make the other guy die for his country" - George S. Patton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 118 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson