Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: connectthedots


<<<< Well, not really. They don't attempt to explain the original genesis of life, because that's not the purview of the Theory of Evolution. >>>>


<< Are you saying that it was never part of the ToE or closely associated with the ToE, or that it currently is not? >>


Never was. Evolution is about how the great VARIETY of life came to be. Abiogenesis is about how LIFE came to be. We don't know about the latter -- not yet; we know a lot about the former.


M





49 posted on 10/12/2005 6:28:22 PM PDT by Ulugh Beg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies ]


To: Ulugh Beg
Never was. Evolution is about how the great VARIETY of life came to be. Abiogenesis is about how LIFE came to be. We don't know about the latter -- not yet; we know a lot about the former.

Never was? That's a crock. It has a long history of being closely associated with evolution. It certainly was in the 60s and 70s when I was in school.

How life came to be is the pink elephant in the room that the evolutionist pretends isn't there. Modern microbiology has clearly established that abiogenesis is impossible, so the evolutionist had to abandon that tenant in order to help maintain some semblance of credibility in evolution.

52 posted on 10/12/2005 9:59:24 PM PDT by connectthedots
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson