Cite a scientist who has suggested that "a purely scientific approach to everything...is all there is". What rude claptrap.
I don't know if any do or don't. I know of at least some that very much don't, like Dr. Hugh Ross, founder of Reasons to Believe and co-author of "Who Was Adam?" I'm not sure how you get from anything I posted that I ever said I knew of any particular scientist(s) that think that way. I was responding only to King Prout whose every reply to me gave me plenty of indication that HE seems to think that way. Maybe he doesn't, but constantly ignoring my philosophical arguments as if they weren't even there I saw as something of a clue. If I'm wrong about that, Mr. Prout, my apologies...