[AntiGuv]

It means that watching a video hardly qualifies you to sit in judgment of the alleged 'controversy' (which exists only in the popular culture, not within the scientific discourse). That might come across as a bit harsh, but it's true. Thousands of scientists who devote their careers to the study of biology and medicine have seen the evidence and reached an undeniable consensus. Why? Did they just miss 'the video'?

That ID video you watched probably gave you the sum total there is worth saying about ID, not counting the time spent on nonsense rhetoric and fallacies designed to distort and mislead. Put that up against the sum total of research supporting evolution - the vast mountains of confirmation supporting evolution - and then make an assessment. The evidence for evolution is more than the dozen pages of dumbed-down text that the average person might have vaguely paid attention to in HS sophomore bio class..

[conservativebabe]

Oh for crying out loud! I'm not taking a "video" as absolute proof and I never said I was "qualified" to sit in judgement. I have clearly said that I am NOT a scientist, I do NOT accept it on it's face, only that I am willing to learn more about it and that I do NOT accept Darwinian theory on it's face either. It too has significant problems.

So, excuse me for asking questions and trying to become more informed.

While your at it, come down off your own high horse.