Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: mlc9852

No, I personally wouldn't expect it. But that doesn't mean he should give the democrats obvious fodder and go on the record with it.

I would HOPE that if, theoretically, a better candidate was atheist, he would go with the better candidate. We're appointing a jurist, not a pope - and I'm a practicing Catholic, so that's not a swipe at Christianity.


42 posted on 10/12/2005 10:12:14 AM PDT by Rutles4Ever (Stuck on Genius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]


To: Rutles4Ever

Everyone knows he would never nominate an atheist.


44 posted on 10/12/2005 10:13:42 AM PDT by mlc9852
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies ]

To: Rutles4Ever

>I would HOPE that if, theoretically, a better candidate was atheist, he would go with the better candidate. We're appointing a jurist, not a pope - and I'm a practicing Catholic, so that's not a swipe at Christianity.<

You sound more like one of those Dems that calls CSpan on the GOP line and bashes Bush.

No Christian would advocate putting an agent of Satan in a position of leadership.I suggest you do a little less practicing and a little more being.


93 posted on 10/12/2005 11:15:21 AM PDT by Blessed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson