Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: p[adre29

I think Bush was operating under the assumption that he could nominate anyone who doesn't drool during the confirmation hearings and get them confirmed. Talking about her religion is troublesome at best, absolutely asinine at worst.


278 posted on 10/12/2005 8:17:08 PM PDT by nonliberal (Graduate: Curtis E. LeMay School of International Relations)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]


To: nonliberal
"Who doesn't drool"

Now i do not know Ms. Miers, but that is a terrible way to
characterize her. She may be schmuck or she may be simply
brilliant, we do not know.

Why not Ms. Meirs? All of the blue blood rage aside, (and
after years of being dumped on by them this is sweet) why
not let them whine for a change?

(Am I the only one who remembers George Will's classically lib
statement "We must repeal the embarrassing 2nd amendment)
Until one remembers stuff like that, spare me the the
hysterical verbiage.
284 posted on 10/12/2005 9:37:44 PM PDT by p[adre29 (Arma in armatos)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 278 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson