Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: jveritas
How do you know she is not qualified?

A. She has not done the type of legal work that would indicate she is qualified.

B. Many individuals with experience in the process of Constitutional law and the SCOTUS did not consider her to have the requisite qualifications for the SCOTUS.

C. She has not been identified as a person with such surpassing skills and a brilliant legal mind that lack of practicing qualifications as a judge would be secondary considerations.

To put it in sporting terms, the vast majority of major league baseball players spend time in the minors developing their skills before being promoted to the big leagues. A very select few superb talents can bypass the minors and go straight to the bigs. Miers hasn't played in the legal "minor leagues" that precede a SCOTUS justice-ship, and she hasn't demonstrated the skills and intellectual underpinnings one would expect in someone who bypasses the normal preparatory stages.

129 posted on 10/12/2005 12:15:19 PM PDT by cogitator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies ]


To: cogitator
BS to the nth degree. There is absolutely zero requirement for someone to be a "constiutional expert" to become a Supreme Court justice. As I said before, the US Consitution greatness is that it is was written by enlightened men so any ordinary citizen can understand it and does not require experts to do so.
135 posted on 10/12/2005 12:24:26 PM PDT by jveritas (The Axis of Defeatism: Left wing liberals, Buchananites, and third party voters.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 129 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson