[pigdog]

... and I did not say there were 450 refutations - merely that the points were well-refuted by the 450 following posts... and indeed they were.

It seems you did not read the balance of the thread involved nor many of the other threads where these points have been discussed. Many of them are covered within the same thread. And certainly I do not agree with your lists of "winners" and "losers" (though that was not the way you originally referred to those in your lists.

I see no reason to keep repeating answers to you that you obviously do not read or, perhaps, do not understand. I can find plenty of other ways to waste my time.

[hripka]

... and I did not say there were 450 refutations - merely that the points were well-refuted by the 450 following posts... and indeed they were.

What does that even mean?

And certainly I do not agree with your lists of "winners" and "losers" (though that was not the way you originally referred to those in your lists.

The title of the article was "Winners and Losers under the 'FairTax' " and the first list was labled: "List of those who would benefit under the 'FairTax' plan:"

Which one of "those who would benefit" do you disagree with?