[will of the people]

Since you brought up the amoeba, A. dubia has the largest genome yet known, 670 billion base pairs. Despite the fact that its origins predate yours, and almost certainly the toad's, it is measurably more "complex" in a very real sense than both you and the toad.

Maybe you saw the chart, but there's a bit more to it than that.



Maybe you counted the genome base pairs, but there's more to 'complexity' than that.

If it will help you to accept my argument, I have had this assertion backed up by several leading toad philosophers as well as the board of complex amoeba.

4 out of 5 higher paired genome creatures agree- humans are more complex than they are


Just where do genome pairs prove the lack of intelligent design? If everything thing that is offered by evolutionists today is true (and we know it's not or there wouldn't be constant changes to the theory). But, if everything is true and accurate, what portion must exclude a Designer?

I must sign off now. I need to concentrate on increasing my complexity to that of a toad, or dare I hope- an amoeba.

[Junior]

...and we know it's not or there wouldn't be constant changes to the theory...

There have been no changes to the basic theory. There have been refinements regarding processes, but nothing has changed the Theory of Evolution in the last 146 years.

[Senator Bedfellow]

If it will help you to accept my argument, I have had this assertion backed up by several leading toad philosophers as well as the board of complex amoeba.

Uh huh. Just FYI, this:

was not the science museum.