Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 10/11/2005 10:45:52 PM PDT by Ol' Sparky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Ol' Sparky

"I don't know anybody who is buying what the White House is selling here," said one Republican staffer.




There are plenty of folks here on FR that would believe the moon was made of swiss cheese if George W told them it was.


2 posted on 10/11/2005 10:48:19 PM PDT by trubluolyguy (I am conservative. That is NOT the same thing as Republican. Don't place party over principle.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ol' Sparky

What a shame that qualified nominees have to withdraw from consideration because of what the Democrats have done to the confirmation process.

I really want to BEAT them hard for doing this to the country. Well, in elections!


15 posted on 10/11/2005 11:38:56 PM PDT by indianrightwinger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ol' Sparky

------ Staffers also said many of them chuckled over a biographical "pocket card" of talking points about Miss Miers that the White House distributed for use by any senator wishing to praise the nominee. "They had to double-space it," said one aide, laughing. ------

This is a very clever way to say what I have felt from the get go. No substance to prove that she is an originalist in the mold of Scalia/Thomas.


16 posted on 10/11/2005 11:42:49 PM PDT by indianrightwinger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ol' Sparky

how did an article in the times get put in general / chat?


19 posted on 10/12/2005 12:11:14 AM PDT by flashbunny (Sorry, but I'm allergic to KoolAid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ol' Sparky; Stellar Dendrite
The Catch .22 for Harriet Miers:

As posted on an earlier thread, the Dems will immediately ask Miers about her advice to the President on GWOT-related issues: GITMO, Abu Ghraib, detention of US citizens, Patriot Act, etc. She will naturally invoke attorney-client privilege and reveal nothing. Fine.

Next the Dems (or Reps) will ask her if she would recuse herself should a GITMO/torture/Patriot Act-related issue come before the SCOTUS, having legally advised the President on these matters. If she says "Yes, I'd recuse myself." then her presence on the SCOTUS to help Bush (and America) fight the GWOT would be pointless. If she says "No, I would not recuse myself." then she has to explain why, why there would be no conflict of interest, how what she knows having advised the President would not bias her opinion on the SCOTUS, which goes back to attorney-client privilege.

And if the White House gives limited waivers for her to answer certain questions, they will have opened the floodgate for more information, on Miers and every nominee in the future.

Give her a fair hearing, she's DOA. This is a foolish blunder by the President that will be capitalized on by his political enemies and his BOHICA'd Base.

21 posted on 10/12/2005 1:14:28 AM PDT by DTogo (I haven't left the GOP, the GOP left me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ol' Sparky
The whole problem is this:

If we didn't have the Supreme Court making the law in America, we wouldn't have to torture its nominees and demand an anal exam and a quart of their blood.

They are appointed for life and they screw us royally for years and years without our having any recourse.

Judges, as untouchable tyrants, are destroying America.

26 posted on 10/12/2005 3:13:41 AM PDT by NoControllingLegalAuthority
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ol' Sparky
A second meeting last week between staffers and White House officials devolved into a confrontational affair. Republican Senate aides who attended that meeting say the White House no longer returns their phone calls and e-mails seeking information about Miss Miers.

Those Republican staff aides are the core group that's needed to move the nomination through the Judiciary Committee and then the Senate. If the WH isn't returning "phone calls and e-mails seeking information about [Ms] Miers[,]" then the nomination is in real trouble. The failure to provide that type of information shows there's little legitimate basis for this nomination.

33 posted on 10/12/2005 6:30:48 AM PDT by libstripper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ol' Sparky
In one staff meeting last week in the office of Judiciary Committee chief counsel Michael O'Neill, a staffer reportedly cried in disappointment.

First the 'Rats in 2000 and 2004, then George Voinovich over Bolton, and now this. GWB certainly is an expert at having his opponents cry like babies. Never thought I'd see the day when Republican staffers would channel Sally Struthers. Hilarious!!

48 posted on 10/12/2005 11:05:59 AM PDT by You Dirty Rats (Lashed to the USS George W. Bush: "Damn the Torpedos, Full Miers Ahead!!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ol' Sparky
A conservative lobbyist for Republican judicial nominees said that fighting for the Miers nomination has been "utterly joyless." "I don't even want to be in politics anymore," said the lobbyist. "Why don't I just give up and move to suburban Maryland and work in communications for some big corporation?"

Life is hard for true-believers.

49 posted on 10/12/2005 11:09:03 AM PDT by RobbyS ( CHIRHO)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ol' Sparky
A conservative lobbyist for Republican judicial nominees said that fighting for the Miers nomination has been "utterly joyless." "I don't even want to be in politics anymore," said the lobbyist. "Why don't I just give up and move to suburban Maryland and work in communications for some big corporation?"

Life is hard for true-believers.

50 posted on 10/12/2005 11:09:08 AM PDT by RobbyS ( CHIRHO)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson