re: "what's up with that?"
Quite interesting. I think there's a good chance that Miller is "going down." Reports are all over the place, but at least some say that she was only asked about July meetings, and only asked to produce documents relevant to the July meetings. I wonder whether the NYT, in trying to protect itself, "went through her files" and found these documents. Reports are that these notes were in the DC office, not in her NY office. Weird. The fact that she met with the prosecutor for hours (8?) yesterday indicates to me that she's in trouble - and is either "singing" per some plea-bargain, or is trying to wiggle her way out.
That was my understanding, that the scope of the investigation was on the July meetings and Libby's defense would have focused on that time period. It may have not been intentional to leave the June conversations out of the testimony. Heck, for all we know, they may not be relevant.