Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: maryz
I just thought you considered any idea of Harry Reid's a disqualifier.

Why would you think that?
It would be an assumption without evidence if you did.
I think taking advice from the opposition leader on specific names the opposition would like to see on the court and then using it as a selling point to your own base is really inept.

But that is a specific idea that I find objectionable, not any idea. It is quite different than simply pointing to Reid's acknowledgment of the long Senate tradition of supporting one of their own.

Now if Reid's suggestion had come with the qualifier that it must be a specific Senator, say, Senator Robert Byrd, and Bush took that specific advice, then I would be critical of him for doing so. I see little difference between that and what Bush actually did.
752 posted on 10/12/2005 12:57:19 PM PDT by counterpunch (Save the GOP - withdraw Miers now)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 749 | View Replies ]


To: counterpunch
Well, because you said "now we're taking Harry Reid's ideas."

Reid did suggest names -- as I recall many of them were conservative. Without checking, I don't know how many came from states with Dem governors who would name a replacement. In any case, I'm sure Reid thought it would be a great idea to get rid of a conservative senator and get a Dem.

755 posted on 10/12/2005 1:41:33 PM PDT by maryz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 752 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson