Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: JCEccles
"We also know that Bush only considered women for the slot. If he had five women in mind, four declined. That's believeable. He should have broadened his criteria to include men instead of playing affirmative action quota games. He would have found qualified nominees willing to face the jackals on the Senate Judiciary Commitee."

I have not made up my mind and I am willing (somewhat) to give the President the benefit of the doubt, however, I was not happy about the comments by Laura Bush that sexism was a possible motive for discontent, nor was I thrilled that the thread discussing that was pulled this morning. If Mrs. Bush makes a comment, then as far as I'm concerned, her comments are up for discussion.

304 posted on 10/11/2005 10:19:17 PM PDT by sageb1 (This is the Final Crusade. There are only 2 sides. Pick one.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]


To: sageb1
I was even more irked by the fact that some people decided to criticize us for speaking out against the First Lady's comments.

Since when is criticizing pro-abortion, pro-quota public figures disallowed?

309 posted on 10/11/2005 10:21:19 PM PDT by Do not dub me shapka broham ("We don't want a Supreme Court justice just like George W. Bush. We can do better.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 304 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson