To: decal
It you're reduced to quoting from the Austin antiAmerican-Statesman, well, you may as well say "Hitler" and be done with it - you've already lost the argument.
You mean to say this Lottery Official doesn't really exist?
Are you telling me Ted Kennedy isn't going to make any hay out of this?
Do you mean to tell me this guy isn't going to quickly become the latest celebrity of the Left?
Do you want us all to believe that any of this is going to help Bush or the confirmation of his nominee?
I was really looking forward to a discussion about the proper role of the Judiciary. Instead it looks like Bush decided to pick someone who will just ensure we have another discussion about himself.
31 posted on
10/11/2005 7:45:25 PM PDT by
counterpunch
(Save the GOP - withdraw Miers now)
To: counterpunch
"Are you telling me Ted Kennedy isn't going to make any hay out of this?"
Are you telling me you give a hang what that sot has to say on ANY subject?
41 posted on
10/11/2005 7:53:44 PM PDT by
decal
(Mother Nature and Real Life are conservatives; the Progs have never figured this out.)
To: counterpunch
You mean to say this Lottery Official doesn't really exist? He does. It will cost him $50,000 to break the confidentiality agreement he signed.
46 posted on
10/11/2005 7:56:42 PM PDT by
sinkspur
(If you're not willing to give Harriett Miers a hearing, I don't give a damn what you think.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson