[bkepley]

If all this sarcasm about "angels" is not hostility, I don't know what is.

[jennyp]

If all this sarcasm about "angels" is not hostility, I don't know what is.

Hostility towards misguided & sometimes downright dishonest creationist arguments, maybe. But hostility toward religious belief per se? No.

[gobucks]

"If all this sarcasm about "angels" is not hostility, I don't know what is."

Good point.

[spunkets]

"I don't know what is."

You got that right.

[microgood]

If all this sarcasm about "angels" is not hostility, I don't know what is.

It's the contradictory nature of the Darwinists. They say they are not hostile to religion as they ridicule it. Also they also defend their theory by saying it is equivalent to say physics.

And what they do not understand is that people do not take gravity personally, but when they are told they are a random happening whose life is an meaningless accident, they do. There's your sign.

That is why picking on evolution is not picking on science, it is picking on evolution. And they know that, they will just never admit it and will hide behind physics until *ell freezes over.