Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: calcowgirl
"Today the U.S. Supreme Court has said in its ruling essentially that it is OK for a white prosecutor to kick all of the African Americans off of a jury."

If he was innocent then she'd be saying "today is a sad day. An innocent man has been condemned to death". Instead she says it's a sad day because of some racial issue involving jury selection. Doesn't sound like she's all that convinced of his innocence.

10 posted on 10/11/2005 4:37:40 PM PDT by Numbers Guy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Numbers Guy

"That court, as did the Supreme Court, refused to grant Williams another hearing based on his argument that prosecutors violated his rights when they dismissed all potential black jurors from hearing the case."

Why should prosecutors and/or defense have the right to dismiss jurors? There are twelve on a jury so that there is diversity. Once it is established that these folk are disinterested in the outcome of the trial, they should be seated.

Letting the lawyers pick the jury helps the lawyers, helps the side with the stronger team and hurts society. Jurors' time is wasted. Juries are less diverse than they would be. Jurors with expertise in a subject are dismissed, rather than sought.

Our system is upside down.


71 posted on 10/11/2005 6:23:55 PM PDT by Tymesup
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson