Thank you for ruling out moron. Implicit in your statement was the belief that at least >some< of the opposition is probably sexist. I'd like to know why you think so.
I didn't imply anything, I stated that:
"More of the same garbage. She answers a question posed to her that is is possible that some do oppose her because of she is a woman. Of course it is possible, it is even likely and it has nothing to do with anything."
And my statement is factually correct. There is a broad group of Americans who would oppose any woman for any high office, they are the ones who make their women wear burkhas.
But not only is my statement factually correct, I even went so far as to say that it has nothing to do with the nomination.
But that didn't stop you from trying to make an issue where none existed by misquoting and making false assertions, did it?