[jwalsh07]

Me: More of the same garbage. She answers a question posed to her that is is possible that some do oppose her because of she is a woman. Of course it is possible, it is even likely and it has nothing to do with anything.

You: On precisely what grounds do you claim the opposition is likely to be sexist?

By implication, you assert that I have made the claim that the opposition to Miers is sexist. That makes you a moron or a liar and I don't particularly care which.

I have not, nor will I, make that argument. I simply acknowledge that there are undoubtedly some who feel that way and even though there are some who feel that way it has nothing to do with the Miers debate.

Then to compound matters in your last post, you quote out of context so you can whine some more. Go whine somewhere else.

[born in the Bronx]

Ok, first you say it's likely that some of those opposed to her are sexist, and then you call me a liar and a moron because I want to know why you think so.
After thinking it over, I'm inclined to agree that you're partly right. I can't imagine why you call me a liar, but trying to get an intelligent opinion out of you is indeed moronic.