> I understand fully, I AM a scientist.
Evidenmce suggests otherwise. You staggerign lack of understanding of the vast pile of evidence supporting relativity, for example. And then there's THIS howler:
"Evolution remains a theory, unproven."
No scientist worth his salt would ever state such a thing and consider it a useful statement.
> Were there one modern, naturally occuring, example of new species development, just one, then I might concede possibility.
Then you should concede. Do some research.
> While extinction is well documented, and has occurred far, far, more often than not, that is not evolution, just dying out.
True. However, the fact that at one time some species were around and others weren't, and at some later time the originally extant species are now gone and new ones are there, is sufficient evidence, when one takes a look a tthe vast warehouse of such things.
You want me to dig up your evidence?
Put up or shut up.