To: TommyDale
Read my comment again with the emphasis on "possible".
Read my comment again with the emphasis on IMPOSSIBLE. To suggest the sexist angle is not only a low blow, it is one that is demonstrably false. It is likely a MAJORITY of people who oppose this nomination prefered one of the conservative WOMEN who have proven themselves in the trenches. The rest, would have been content with ANYONE who was demonstrably conservative.
The "possible" sexism is merely a cautious liberal speaking. The effect is the same: a charge of sexism. Wake up.
93 posted on
10/11/2005 6:55:25 AM PDT by
safisoft
(Give me Torah!)
To: safisoft
You are hitting a brick wall. It is not only possible, but I have actually heard people SAY that they are opposed because Miers is a woman. I agree that this is a stupid thing for them to say, but it is being said. I think you are so defensive that you are overlooking that nothing is 100%. That means it is possible. I am quite awake, incidentally.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson